From Bloomberg: "Argentines Decry State's `Disastrous' Record as Pensions Seized." Excerpt:
Fourteen years ago, Raul Zimmermann opted to contribute to one of Argentina's new private pension funds because he didn't trust in the state retirement system. Now he's outraged by government plans to seize his savings and take responsibility for paying his monthly benefit.``The history of the pensions managed by the state is disastrous,'' said Zimmermann, 69, who started drawing a pension two years ago. ``It's not reasonable that they transfer my account without even asking me if I want to.''
On Oct. 21, President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner announced plans to take over $29 billion of private pension accounts, saying a state-run system would protect retirees from fluctuations in financial markets. Roque Fernandez, an economy minister and central bank president in the 1990s, said the move is a ``confiscation'' of people's savings. . .
More links:
Also, see this OpEd from Investors Business Daily: "Argentina Spreads the Wealth." Excerpt:
U.S. Democrats in Congress are mulling like-minded moves to scrap 401(k)s and transfer them into government-managed "guaranteed retirement accounts" with a 3% return, according to James Pethokoukis of U.S. News & World Report (full disclosure: Pethokoukis is a former IBD reporter).Before they charge ahead, they should look at what happened since Argentina's announcement: Its stock market lost 23% of its value in two days, for a 57% loss since January. The losses spread to other markets in Brazil, South Africa and Spain.
Markets don't like expropriation of private property — including savings. And this takes away a key source of private capital. Moreover, one quarter of private pension assets were by law invested in Argentine stocks, making up about a quarter of the bourse's value. So the seizure of pensions amounts to government ownership across the entire private sector.
"It's a stealth nationalization of every single business in the country," explained Diana Mondino, an Argentinian economist at Universidad del CEMA in Buenos Aires. "Will (the government) influence those companies? I would think so — anyone who owns 25% of a company will have a lot to say about how it's run."
Growth will suffer, and Moody's already warns it "undermines the government's already weak policy credibility."
Previous post here.